|
|
Post by drs on Jun 3, 2015 6:06:35 GMT -5
Even if you don't like guns, watch this! Should be required viewing by both sides of the issue of gun control/legislation. Here is a man who knows the constitution. Watch the faces of some Senators in the audience. www.youtube.com/embed/_T-F_zfoDqI?rel=0 |
|
|
|
Post by swilk on Jun 3, 2015 7:05:06 GMT -5
You arent under the impression that was real are you? Just wondering because of the "watch the faces of some Senators...." thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by drs on Jun 3, 2015 9:13:07 GMT -5
You arent under the impression that was real are you? Just wondering because of the "watch the faces of some Senators...." thing. Yes, and though it was good and accurate. I see you are always the first (and only) individual that is quick to respond, with some negative remark, toward my posts or threads. If you don't like it, swilk, then please don't respond. I think you are anti-2nd amendment, sometimes in your replies. (BTW "arent" is correctly spelled "aren't".  |
|
|
|
Post by swilk on Jun 3, 2015 9:22:29 GMT -5
Lol....okay.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jamie Brooks 1John5:13 on Jun 3, 2015 15:09:15 GMT -5
You arent under the impression that was real are you? Just wondering because of the "watch the faces of some Senators...." thing. Yes, and though it was good and accurate. I see you are always the first (and only) individual that is quick to respond, with some negative remark, toward my posts or threads. If you don't like it, swilk, then please don't respond. I think you are anti-2nd amendment, sometimes in your replies. (BTW "arent" is correctly spelled "aren't". Hi Dave! The video expresses an excellent argument for defending the second amendment, but the point swilk was making is that this guy was not speaking before this audience. Regardless, the argument was excellent. |
|
|
|
Post by swilk on Jun 3, 2015 18:50:24 GMT -5
I did appreciate the irony in correcting my misspelling of aren't while at the same time posting "though" instead of "thought"....
Anyway, yes...I was simply pointing out this was a satire "virtual" president and was not an actual presentation before Congress.
|
|
|
|
Post by drs on Jun 4, 2015 4:20:49 GMT -5
I did appreciate the irony in correcting my misspelling of aren't while at the same time posting "though" instead of "thought".... Anyway, yes...I was simply pointing out this was a satire "virtual" president and was not an actual presentation before Congress. I am sorry, swilk. I must have just misunderstood what you were posting in response to my thread. But you have to admit that fellow made good sense in his argument for the Second Amendment. Actually, a good friend of mine sent me that by e-mail, and I thought it was interesting to share here. ALSO, don't take my mentioning of your misspelling of [aren't] serious, as we can just call it a "typo" error. I make plenty of spelling/typo errors too. |
|
|
|
Post by drs on Jun 4, 2015 4:22:15 GMT -5
Yes, and though it was good and accurate. I see you are always the first (and only) individual that is quick to respond, with some negative remark, toward my posts or threads. If you don't like it, swilk, then please don't respond. I think you are anti-2nd amendment, sometimes in your replies. (BTW "arent" is correctly spelled "aren't". Hi Dave! The video expresses an excellent argument for defending the second amendment, but the point swilk was making is that this guy was not speaking before this audience. Regardless, the argument was excellent. Thanks, Jon. |
|
