|
|
Post by singlestacksig on Nov 19, 2015 20:10:45 GMT -5
If i as a landowner give someone permission to hunt but put harvest restrictions. Antlerless only for example and the hunter shoots an antlered deer anyway. Is that the same as hunting without permission?
|
|
|
|
Post by morrison on Nov 22, 2015 18:46:22 GMT -5
I would be inclined to say No. However, you can withdraw your permission to let someone hunt upon properly informing them that you no longer give them permission to hunt on your property. If you give someone permission to hunt under the stipulation that they can only take does, that would be a civil issue versus a criminal issue.
However, if you give someone permission to hunt rabbits and you learn they are hunting deer without your consent, that would be criminal. You typically get permission to hunt based on species not on antlered or antlerless. For example, you have permission to waterfowl hunt, squirrel hunt, and rabbit hunt but I do not allow anyone else to deer hunt because my nephew deer hunts back here. I hope that makes sense.
|
|
