|
|
Post by tynimiller on Jan 22, 2018 9:30:58 GMT -5
I've been attempting, with zero success, at finding out how long IN can utilize my lifetime license to earn the reimbursement for the PR Act...anyone know?
I've heard from multiple sources LTL's have a sunset time where they no longer count...and if mine no longer counts I'm going to start buying at least a small game license to support it.
Thanks for any information on this....
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Jan 22, 2018 10:08:04 GMT -5
I dont think so.. but there is an attrition rate.. some of us old guys have either died off or quit hunting..they account for that.
|
|
|
|
Post by tynimiller on Jan 22, 2018 10:12:28 GMT -5
If there isn't a sunset clause for it counting then I won't...don't feel like bugging Joe (as he has his hands full) but may as I bet he would know.
|
|
|
|
Post by antiwheeze on Jan 22, 2018 11:09:48 GMT -5
I was in a DNR meeting at Ft Ben when this was being discussed. My bad memory thinks it's 15 years.
|
|
|
|
Post by antiwheeze on Jan 22, 2018 11:20:59 GMT -5
There was a proposal for a nominal license fee ($1) to generate about $10 in federal funds that would otherwise be lost. The nominal license would be for those no longer paying into the system due to age military service etc.
I can't remember it the notion caught any traction.
I have an ltl and would also give $1 to get the PR money.
|
|
|
|
Post by esshup on Jan 22, 2018 15:06:12 GMT -5
There was a proposal for a nominal license fee ($1) to generate about $10 in federal funds that would otherwise be lost. The nominal license would be for those no longer paying into the system due to age military service etc. I can't remember it the notion caught any traction. I have an ltl and would also give $1 to get the PR money. Ditto |
|
|
|
Post by firstwd on Jan 22, 2018 19:44:45 GMT -5
There was a proposal for a nominal license fee ($1) to generate about $10 in federal funds that would otherwise be lost. The nominal license would be for those no longer paying into the system due to age military service etc. I can't remember it the notion caught any traction. I have an ltl and would also give $1 to get the PR money. I proposed an annual "registration" fee like the system with cars to make each lifetime license active and got blasted. I even proposed it as a caveat to selling lifetime licenses again, and I got blasted by some current LTL holders that they would sue the state for breach of contract. I am a LTL holder and I agree with the idea. |
|
|
|
Post by esshup on Jan 22, 2018 22:29:24 GMT -5
There was a proposal for a nominal license fee ($1) to generate about $10 in federal funds that would otherwise be lost. The nominal license would be for those no longer paying into the system due to age military service etc. I can't remember it the notion caught any traction. I have an ltl and would also give $1 to get the PR money. I proposed an annual "registration" fee like the system with cars to make each lifetime license active and got blasted. I even proposed it as a caveat to selling lifetime licenses again, and I got blasted by some current LTL holders that they would sue the state for breach of contract. I am a LTL holder and I agree with the idea. Electronically, for under $5/year, I'm in if it helps the state get more $$ from the feds. If it's more than that, no. And I don't want that to open the door to keep increasing that yearly "fee" either. What about once every 5,10,15 years or whatever the time interval is for the licenses to stay active for the State to get P/R money? |
|
|
|
Post by firstwd on Jan 23, 2018 6:13:11 GMT -5
I proposed an annual "registration" fee like the system with cars to make each lifetime license active and got blasted. I even proposed it as a caveat to selling lifetime licenses again, and I got blasted by some current LTL holders that they would sue the state for breach of contract. I am a LTL holder and I agree with the idea. Electronically, for under $5/year, I'm in if it helps the state get more $$ from the feds. If it's more than that, no. And I don't want that to open the door to keep increasing that yearly "fee" either. What about once every 5,10,15 years or whatever the time interval is for the licenses to stay active for the State to get P/R money? Sounds great. |
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Jan 23, 2018 8:20:38 GMT -5
I’m pretty sure fishing licenses count too..
I don’t fish but I might buy one to help out..
|
|
|
|
Post by firstwd on Jan 23, 2018 11:34:46 GMT -5
I’m pretty sure fishing licenses count too.. I don’t fish but I might buy one to help out.. They do, but not on PR. There is another Act that escapes me currently that covers fishing. I've always wondered about trapping licenses. |
|
|
|
Post by esshup on Jan 23, 2018 14:28:43 GMT -5
I’m pretty sure fishing licenses count too.. I don’t fish but I might buy one to help out.. They do, but not on PR. There is another Act that escapes me currently that covers fishing. I've always wondered about trapping licenses. Dingall-Johnson Fund? |
|
|
|
Post by throbak on Jan 23, 2018 16:32:19 GMT -5
Correct D/J For Fishing
They get P/R money for lifetime license You want to Help the cheapest way would be to buy a kid a youth license
|
|
|
|
Post by tynimiller on Jan 23, 2018 18:03:20 GMT -5
I’m pretty sure fishing licenses count too.. I don’t fish but I might buy one to help out.. My understanding it each license gets them $10 when it comes to fishing. |
|
|
|
Post by throbak on Jan 23, 2018 18:09:30 GMT -5
Correct D/J For Fishing
They get P/R money for lifetime license You want to Help the cheapest way would be to buy a kid a youth license
|
|
