|
Post by esshup on Jan 11, 2023 12:09:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by whitetaildave24 on Jan 11, 2023 12:46:44 GMT -5
No surprise, but again….Wow
|
|
|
Post by jjas on Jan 11, 2023 13:01:01 GMT -5
No surprise, but again….Wow It'll be interesting to see how all this shakes out and I'm sure it'll be in the courts ASAP.
|
|
|
Post by Sasquatch on Jan 11, 2023 17:06:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by duff on Jan 21, 2023 7:14:25 GMT -5
Just saw a gun activist on you tubes cover this topic and that most of the sheriff's in the state have done the same. Absolutely insane .
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Jan 21, 2023 10:44:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Mean Gene on Jan 21, 2023 10:48:37 GMT -5
Like I said before, the Bruen decision will obliterate this law.
|
|
|
Post by esshup on Jan 21, 2023 12:27:30 GMT -5
But that restraining order only applies to the people that were named in the case. I believe it is less than 900 people that can disregard the law via that restraining order.
|
|
|
Post by Mean Gene on Jan 21, 2023 14:48:19 GMT -5
But that restraining order only applies to the people that were named in the case. I believe it is less than 900 people that can disregard the law via that restraining order. Won't matter. It will end up in the Supreme Court and the entire law will be struck down.
|
|
|
Post by esshup on Jan 22, 2023 0:01:06 GMT -5
But that restraining order only applies to the people that were named in the case. I believe it is less than 900 people that can disregard the law via that restraining order. Won't matter. It will end up in the Supreme Court and the entire law will be struck down. I agree. I talked to a customer in Illinois today and I have to go review the law before I drive there to see if what I have for a CCW is legal or not. Last year it was, BUT only if I stayed in the vehicle. Once I exited the vehicle, it was supposed to be unloaded and either the ammo or the gun locked up. Stupid laws.
|
|