|
|
Post by NON-TYPICAL on Sept 6, 2009 15:09:20 GMT -5
Checked the cam and found this deer a couple times. How big do you think he will go?   My buddy said hold off 1 more year. I think he's nuts!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Sept 6, 2009 15:32:52 GMT -5
Wowee! I don’t think I could score it with a tape…   That is a shooter right now... |
|
|
|
Post by Decatur on Sept 6, 2009 16:55:04 GMT -5
If I saw him, I'd take him! Very unique rack. Hope you get a crack at him!
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Sept 6, 2009 17:16:42 GMT -5
.................. My buddy said hold off 1 more year. I think he's nuts!!!!!! That deer might not get any better. He looks ot be a 4 1/2 or 5 1/2 to me. TAKE HIM! |
|
|
|
Post by HuntMeister on Sept 6, 2009 18:26:09 GMT -5
We really need to see him on the ground!!
Not sure how to go about taping that bone, pretty amazing mass.
|
|
|
|
Post by freedomhunter on Sept 7, 2009 6:28:49 GMT -5
You would have to have some booners running around to pass up that buck. Not very many palmated typicals like that around. It might score non-typical with the extra beams (drops?) on each side. I'd put him on the wall in a heartbeat!
|
|
|
|
Post by WhoDey78 on Sept 7, 2009 6:49:41 GMT -5
Not an experienced scorer, but that is one wicked rack!
|
|
|
|
Post by cambygsp on Sept 7, 2009 7:05:37 GMT -5
Score this deer?..... I would give a 9.9..........very nice!
|
|
|
|
Post by hunterchick4589 on Sept 7, 2009 11:21:44 GMT -5
Very nice, and unique! good luck this season!
|
|
|
|
Post by jgrimm on Sept 7, 2009 20:13:00 GMT -5
forget the score, just shoot him!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by DEERTRACKS on Sept 8, 2009 8:22:07 GMT -5
Tricky one to score due to the palmation & lack of uniformity. 160+/-  SHOOTER! I love the strange shaped racks......... |
|
|
|
Post by indianahick on Sept 8, 2009 8:31:31 GMT -5
On a scale of 1 to 10 it gets a 9.5. Lots of hamburger there and that rack will look good on a plaque on the wall.
|
|
|
|
Post by buckmastermoe on Sept 8, 2009 19:21:15 GMT -5
Wow ! What a deer. I like the rack. i know i would take him if he walked in front of me. I say 9.5 as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by mullis56 on Sept 8, 2009 21:59:16 GMT -5
I'd kill him, when I was a kid, now and when I'm older! He is a shooter!
|
|
|
|
Post by scrub-buster on Sept 9, 2009 0:20:18 GMT -5
Shoot first, score later.
|
|
|
|
Post by dbd870 on Sept 9, 2009 6:42:55 GMT -5
As for what to use, that totally depends on your skill with said equipment.
|
|
|
|
Post by DEERTRACKS on Sept 9, 2009 11:13:11 GMT -5
As for what to use, that totally depends on your skill with said equipment. DITTO!  |
|
|
|
Post by NON-TYPICAL on Sept 9, 2009 13:28:00 GMT -5
The choice of weapon makes no difference to me, I capable with either or. I was just looking to see what the majority would choose to use if presented with the oppurtunity to do so.
The way I see it is getting the opportunity to have a chance at this deer is going to be hard enough. But adding the recurve to the mix makes for more of a memorable hunt and a challenge.
Most people are telling me It be crazy to go after it with a recurve. I look at it as how many hunters would love to get a deer like this with a recurve. My only concern would be penetration on the deer and the limitation on the distance. I normally stay under 20 yards with the recurve, and with my luck it will show up at 40 yds. This is my dilema, I guess if it's ment to be it will happen either way. Just trying to see what other people think about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Sept 9, 2009 13:40:23 GMT -5
The choice of weapon makes no difference to me, I capable with either or. I was just looking to see what the majority would choose to use if presented with the oppurtunity to do so. The way I see it is getting the opportunity to have a chance at this deer is going to be hard enough. But adding the recurve to the mix makes for more of a memorable hunt and a challenge. Most people are telling me It be crazy to go after it with a recurve. I look at it as how many hunters would love to get a deer like this with a recurve. My only concern would be penetration on the deer and the limitation on the distance. I normally stay under 20 yards with the recurve, and with my luck it will show up at 40 yds. This is my dilema, I guess if it's ment to be it will happen either way. Just trying to see what other people think about it. If you are good to go with a recurve out to 20 - go for it. It is the journey that counts, not the destination..... |
|
|
|
Post by DEERTRACKS on Sept 9, 2009 13:42:58 GMT -5
The choice of weapon makes no difference to me, I capable with either or. I was just looking to see what the majority would choose to use if presented with the oppurtunity to do so. The way I see it is getting the opportunity to have a chance at this deer is going to be hard enough. But adding the recurve to the mix makes for more of a memorable hunt and a challenge. Most people are telling me It be crazy to go after it with a recurve. I look at it as how many hunters would love to get a deer like this with a recurve. My only concern would be penetration on the deer and the limitation on the distance. I normally stay under 20 yards with the recurve, and with my luck it will show up at 40 yds. This is my dilema, I guess if it's ment to be it will happen either way. Just trying to see what other people think about it. Use both & mix it up a bit on alternating days. Hopefully you can put the smack-down on the rascal for your most memorable hunt when you are carrying the recurve...... Good luck! |
|
