|
|
Post by lefty on Nov 10, 2009 14:13:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tpdrhntr on Nov 10, 2009 16:52:09 GMT -5
Nice Deer
|
|
|
|
Post by trophyhunter1 on Nov 10, 2009 19:56:07 GMT -5
great deer but i can`t see it breaking the wr.
|
|
|
|
Post by Woody Williams on Nov 10, 2009 20:10:33 GMT -5
Time will tell....lots of mass there, but WRs are made with tine length...
|
|
|
|
Post by ridgerunner on Nov 10, 2009 20:11:26 GMT -5
I'd like to see a better picuture from the front..can't tell much from that one..other than it does has good mass...
|
|
|
|
Post by bigballer on Nov 11, 2009 6:23:36 GMT -5
Right below the picture in the article is a link that will take you to about 30 pics or something like that. I don't think it's the new WR either. To non-typical if you ask me.
BB
|
|
|
|
Post by ridgerunner on Nov 11, 2009 6:50:47 GMT -5
not even close to the World record...that 's a nice buck, but I'm guessing 180's..not much width for a World Class buck..I don't think it's even going to be a State Record for Wisconsin.
|
|
|
|
Post by powderfinger on Nov 11, 2009 7:34:45 GMT -5
Not a chance of WR...Hanson's deer will NEVER be beat. Its a freak.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sasquatch on Nov 11, 2009 9:02:19 GMT -5
Awesome deer....but not even close to a world record. That one forked tine will drop it way down in terms of typical score. But, who cares? What a monster.
|
|
|
|
Post by bsutravis on Nov 11, 2009 9:47:18 GMT -5
Unreal buck.... looks like moose antlers with all that palmation...... but way too many deductions and not enough spread to get to Milo's numbers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Greenedog on Nov 11, 2009 11:39:32 GMT -5
Maybe a whitetail crossed with a moose up there. ;D That is an awesome deer, but no WR breaker.
|
|
|
|
Post by fullrut on Nov 11, 2009 22:21:05 GMT -5
NO WAY. RIGHT G2 is forked=Major deduction. Nice deer but not a world record.
|
|
|
|
Post by lugnutz on Nov 12, 2009 1:36:43 GMT -5
cant believe they had 200+ inch deer in 1914!
|
|
