|
|
Post by esshup on Jul 12, 2020 21:53:16 GMT -5
www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5717/text Yes, it is a long read. The big data points that stood out to me are the following: 1) Federal Gun Ownership license AND database. 2) Federal license needed to buy ammo 3) ALL firearm transfers have to go through a dealer 4) No threaded barrels - that means that even guns with muzzle brakes would be illegal 5) Any shotgun that could hold more than 5 shells would be illegal (nothing was mentioned about the length of the shells, so that could mean that ALL semi-auto and pump shotguns would be illegal if they used the Aguilar 1 3/4" shells to measure how many the gun could hold.) 6) 30% tax on firearm purchases. (no mention if that would apply to used guns going from one individual to another through the dealer) 7) 50% tax on shells and cartridges.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2020 6:02:42 GMT -5
www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5717/text Yes, it is a long read. The big data points that stood out to me are the following: 1) Federal Gun Ownership license AND database. 2) Federal license needed to buy ammo 3) ALL firearm transfers have to go through a dealer 4) No threaded barrels - that means that even guns with muzzle brakes would be illegal 5) Any shotgun that could hold more than 5 shells would be illegal (nothing was mentioned about the length of the shells, so that could mean that ALL semi-auto and pump shotguns would be illegal if they used the Aguilar 1 3/4" shells to measure how many the gun could hold.) 6) 30% tax on firearm purchases. (no mention if that would apply to used guns going from one individual to another through the dealer) 7) 50% tax on shells and cartridges. Every bullet point is an infringement on the right to keep and bear arms, and are therefore illegal and unconstitutional. "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) |
|
|
|
Post by moose1am on Jul 13, 2020 10:56:47 GMT -5
www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5717/text Yes, it is a long read. The big data points that stood out to me are the following: 1) Federal Gun Ownership license AND database. 2) Federal license needed to buy ammo 3) ALL firearm transfers have to go through a dealer 4) No threaded barrels - that means that even guns with muzzle brakes would be illegal 5) Any shotgun that could hold more than 5 shells would be illegal (nothing was mentioned about the length of the shells, so that could mean that ALL semi-auto and pump shotguns would be illegal if they used the Aguilar 1 3/4" shells to measure how many the gun could hold.) 6) 30% tax on firearm purchases. (no mention if that would apply to used guns going from one individual to another through the dealer) 7) 50% tax on shells and cartridges. That would be enough to make even me vote for Trump over Biden if that is true. What is wrong with the Democrats. |
|
|
|
Post by moose1am on Jul 13, 2020 10:59:20 GMT -5
www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5717/text Yes, it is a long read. The big data points that stood out to me are the following: 1) Federal Gun Ownership license AND database. 2) Federal license needed to buy ammo 3) ALL firearm transfers have to go through a dealer 4) No threaded barrels - that means that even guns with muzzle brakes would be illegal 5) Any shotgun that could hold more than 5 shells would be illegal (nothing was mentioned about the length of the shells, so that could mean that ALL semi-auto and pump shotguns would be illegal if they used the Aguilar 1 3/4" shells to measure how many the gun could hold.) 6) 30% tax on firearm purchases. (no mention if that would apply to used guns going from one individual to another through the dealer) 7) 50% tax on shells and cartridges. Every bullet point is an infringement on the right to keep and bear arms, and are therefore illegal and unconstitutional. "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) gregr are you aware of the first law that was passed and approved by the US Supreme Court IIRC it was the Federal Firearms Act. The guy who filed the case died before the case went to the supreme court. It was back in the 1930s. The plaintiffs lawyer didn't even show up. It had to do with whether or not a shot gun was used by the military but it allowed the banning of machine guns IIRC. I did some research on that case when I was arguing with some dems about the slippery slope of gun regulation. Give them an inch and they will take a mile. I will never give up my guns or my ammo willingly |
|
|
|
Post by esshup on Jul 13, 2020 20:40:46 GMT -5
Moose, read the link that I posted and you will see that the bullet points (Cliff Notes?) are what is in the durn thing.
|
|
