Post by JohnSmiles on Jun 18, 2007 10:51:04 GMT -5
First, since you cannot reply here, what does the 'Goats' mean MIG?
I have no idea what you are trying to convey with that answer.
As for the answer to the baiting question, it is evident this needs correcting.
Any advice as to who to contact to get this looked into?
As per your answer buster, it is up to the sole discretion of the CO.
That's just Not acceptable.
And not being aware of someone ELSE'S bait or feeder is no excuse.
Not acceptable.
And a person who hunts on their own property, using no bait, is illegal if there is bait or feeders on an adjoining property which might attract deer.
Not acceptable.
Your neighbor could effectively keep you from hunting simply by putting out feeders on his property during deer season.
How in the world long has it been this way, and how do I get it looked into.
While I am sure none you CO's on here have an attitude problem and feel you are above being questioned, and would never abuse the overly wide discretion of this law simply because you just didn't like the guys 'attitude' you were checking out, there are many who would.
And many who have.
There is no reason for this at all.
And no justification.
It is simply a bad law allowing extreme abuse of authority.
Now, whether you agree or not, where do I address this at?
Any advice would be appreciated.
I have no idea what you are trying to convey with that answer.
As for the answer to the baiting question, it is evident this needs correcting.
Any advice as to who to contact to get this looked into?
As per your answer buster, it is up to the sole discretion of the CO.
That's just Not acceptable.
And not being aware of someone ELSE'S bait or feeder is no excuse.
Not acceptable.
And a person who hunts on their own property, using no bait, is illegal if there is bait or feeders on an adjoining property which might attract deer.
Not acceptable.
Your neighbor could effectively keep you from hunting simply by putting out feeders on his property during deer season.
How in the world long has it been this way, and how do I get it looked into.
While I am sure none you CO's on here have an attitude problem and feel you are above being questioned, and would never abuse the overly wide discretion of this law simply because you just didn't like the guys 'attitude' you were checking out, there are many who would.
And many who have.
There is no reason for this at all.
And no justification.
It is simply a bad law allowing extreme abuse of authority.
Now, whether you agree or not, where do I address this at?
Any advice would be appreciated.
