Gill netted fish

[chubwub]

I'm confused about the legality/ethics of this situation.

m.facebook.com/icodistrict4/photos/a.640445116066724.1073741828.637304723047430/816473158463918/?type=3&source=48&ref=content_filter

What was the justification for gill netting these lake trout so that they could not be returned to their waterways alive? Were there alternative methods to gather data without killing them? How many of these fish were killed for this study? How often does the DNR conduct studies of this nature that involve gill netting fish?

Is it considered appropriate to distribute gill netted fish in this manner? If I had been there as a civilian would I have been able to receive some of these fish as well if I had asked?

[morrison]

The study, methods, and duration is something I know nothing about. (The 'training' referred to by the officer had nothing to do with the fish. Our officers are currently conducting boat training to be more prepared to respond to the needs of the public in water related emergencies and incidents.) Those are questions that need to be directed to the DNR Fisheries. I will send them the questions and advise if I get an answer.

I am sure that the most ethical/appropriate method is utilized by our Department. However, some data collection methods used to further the particular species may be at the cost of a small number of the species.

As far as the distribution, I feel this is very appropriate. I am positive that if you were there and asked for the fish, you would have received them. The DNR has no intention of allowing meat of any species go to waste whether it is a seized animal or a species used for data collection. However, our disposal options are limited due to restrictions and/or requirements on food provided for human consumption by Federal and State agencies. This would restrict us from giving meat to food banks, pantries, ect.

If you any additional questions, let me know.